Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does it support JavaFX? #14

Open
goxr3plus opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Does it support JavaFX? #14

goxr3plus opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@goxr3plus
Copy link

Hello , first of all congratulations for your attempt , secondly very happy that found this repository today.

Is it supporting JavaFX or only Swing ?

I will be very glad to contribute on the Windows Development side . I have solid experience with JxBrowser and Java generally.

@goxr3plus goxr3plus changed the title Does it supports JavaFX? Does it support JavaFX? Jun 25, 2019
@BFergerson
Copy link
Owner

BFergerson commented Jun 26, 2019

Journey is essentially a JCEF wrapper. If JCEF can't do it then Journey currently won't be able to. As far as I can tell it doesn't seem to be possible to use JavaFX with JCEF (see here).

If you're able to get JavaFX working with JCEF (but with changes), I would gladly help in getting those integrated with Journey. I don't use JavaFX so I don't know what level of support Journey has with it.

@goxr3plus
Copy link
Author

Ah , JavaFX is Swing replacement.

@BFergerson BFergerson added the question Further information is requested label Jul 13, 2019
@jgcodes2020
Copy link

JCEF has an open issue to provide JavaFX support, but there is a rather bad workaround that only works for offscreen rendering. By changing the GLCanvas in CefBrowserOsr to a GLJPanel, you can embed JCEF in JavaFX, with some keymapping issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants