From 2a59de4780584b06893bb209d4f1820cd2a2d9b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ripley <zkxs00@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:31:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a mistake made in #531 (#532)

I had initially patterned the new license checks on `OsiOnly` and
`FsfOnly` before realizing that perhaps deny!() didn't make sense here,
and I removed it (or so I thought). It seems I blundered and left one
in--sorry.

I believe this deny!() shouldn't be here.

Apologies for the mistake... I thought I'd double-checked my diff but it
seems I did a poor job of it.

(Also, thanks for catching that other mistake I made in #531 Jake)
---
 src/licenses.rs | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/licenses.rs b/src/licenses.rs
index 030084d3..775c27a5 100644
--- a/src/licenses.rs
+++ b/src/licenses.rs
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ fn evaluate_expression(
                 BlanketAgreement::Fsf => {
                     if id.is_fsf_free_libre() {
                         allow!(IsFsfFree);
-                    } else {
-                        deny!(IsFsfFree);
                     }
                 }
                 BlanketAgreement::OsiOnly => {