Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assistance Needed with Overset Mesh Configuration in Nalu-Wind Using TIOGA #1263

Open
physicsWorks42 opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@physicsWorks42
Copy link

Dear Exawind-Community

I am currently running a simulation that utilizes the overset method with the TIOGA library, involving three distinct meshes: the background mesh, wake refinement, and a cylinder. My interest in this setup was piqued by the Nalu-Wind documentation on TIOGA, which discusses a similar case (see documentation). Unfortunately, I could not find the specific mesh described, so I created a new one (see attachment).

After setting up and running Nalu-Wind with this new mesh, I encountered some issues with how TIOGA handles the mesh interfaces. Ideally, I would like the background mesh to only have hole-nodes corresponding to the wake (a square), and the wake to only have hole-nodes around the cylinder (a circle), as illustrated in the documentation here:
image

However, my current mesh configuration appears as follows:
hole-cells

Included in the attachment are the mesh file and the input YAML file configured for the latest Nalu-Wind release (2.0.0).

I would greatly appreciate any guidance on how to achieve a more accurate hole-cell configuration similar to the one shown in the documentation. Has anyone successfully run the original case or a similar one with a "neat" hole-cell setup? Any advice on adjusting my YAML input file to improve the mesh handling would be very helpful.

Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide.

bm_wake_cylinder.zip

@itopcuoglu
Copy link
Contributor

Does your simulation run to completion?

@physicsWorks42
Copy link
Author

Does your simulation run to completion?

Yes, the simulation runs to completion. However, the solution appears awkward because the nodes within the solid structure (the cylinder, in this case) are not designated as holes, as illustrated in my images.

@psakievich
Copy link
Contributor

@itopcuoglu any updates on this one?

@itopcuoglu
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't looked into this yet. This is potentially related to another bug we encountered, which I'm going investigate soon.

@itopcuoglu
Copy link
Contributor

itopcuoglu commented Jun 25, 2024

@physicsWorks42 You need to change the variable symmetry_direction under tioga_options from 2 to 3, or just omit that option since the default value is 3. The hole map functionality works differently when that value is not set to 3. The iblank fields look as expected when that is corrected.

Also, you do not need the set_resolutions: no option. That has recently been made obsolete, and it was not necessary even prior to that. Let me know if this resolves your issue.

background
sphere
wake

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants