Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

direct way to link analysis and biomaterial? #77

Open
bradfordcondon opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

direct way to link analysis and biomaterial? #77

bradfordcondon opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@bradfordcondon
Copy link
Contributor

as part of mapping NCBI data into chado (see #76 ) I am adding NCBI assemblies as Chado analyses. NCBI assemblies are directly associated with biosamples, which map to chado biomaterials. However, there is no biomaterial_analysis linker table.

MAGE provides a way to link biomaterials and analyses, but it is not pretty. I'd have to create a quantificiation, acquisition, assay, and protocol to link them. I'd basically be bluffing for all of those records: i dont have something equivalent in NCBI to populate them with. I'd much prefer to link directly.

I guess its also possible to link biomaterials to analyses via a shared project, but that wouldnt be specific enough if a project had multiple analyses/biomaterials.

What do you all think? is biomaterial_analysis feasible? Does it go against analysis being a single specific run of a program? If so, should we be loading in ncbi assemblies as a different chado type?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant