Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

method keeps looking for whitelist when not provided. #176

Closed
naila53 opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

method keeps looking for whitelist when not provided. #176

naila53 opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@naila53
Copy link

naila53 commented Feb 23, 2023

Hi,
I'm trying to run Cite-seq-count without a whitelist argument, however, it keeps being stuck at the looking for whitelist step after finishing the mapping for hours!
image

@Hoohm
Copy link
Owner

Hoohm commented Feb 24, 2023 via email

@naila53
Copy link
Author

naila53 commented Feb 24, 2023

Hi,
I set the cells parameter to 1million, just thinking of retrieving empty droplets. That's too high right?

@Hoohm
Copy link
Owner

Hoohm commented Feb 24, 2023 via email

@naila53
Copy link
Author

naila53 commented Feb 25, 2023

hi, I need to retrieve the empty droplets for the sake of normalization, to model noise component. I have run your method about a year ago and you can see I posted a different issue here about totalseqB #158
but the point is I used high number of cells as you can see in my run info to retrieve the empty droplets.
I tried again with inputting the raw unfiltered cellranger barcodes list as a whitelist for my data
and kept the -cells argument at 1million cells , it still keeps getting stuck at the final step for hours! and it looks like it's trying to process more than 1million!
I think something has changed in the new version, because it ran fine on all my previous totalseqA data..
image

@Hoohm
Copy link
Owner

Hoohm commented Feb 25, 2023 via email

@naila53
Copy link
Author

naila53 commented Feb 25, 2023

thank you so much for your prompt response! I tried reinstalling the older version( 1.4.3) and I seem to have resolved this. However, I tried to reproduce my previous analysis, I seem to have a new issue with both new and old version where it fails at the very last step!
any ideas? :(
image

@Hoohm
Copy link
Owner

Hoohm commented Feb 25, 2023 via email

@naila53
Copy link
Author

naila53 commented Feb 25, 2023

yes, it is! installed python 3.7 and worked! thank you so much!

@Hoohm Hoohm closed this as completed Jul 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants