Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
353 lines (251 loc) · 23.5 KB

example_data_for_book.md

File metadata and controls

353 lines (251 loc) · 23.5 KB
Raw

Marketing KPIs & Success Metrics

This section provides an overview of key performance indicators (KPIs) and success metrics that are crucial for marketing teams to track. It serves as a comprehensive dashboard to monitor the effectiveness of various marketing strategies and channels, thereby enabling teams to make data-driven decisions.



Sample Dataset #1: Marketing Performance Metrics for 2023

In an increasingly digital and customer-centric world, understanding data is crucial for the success of any marketing campaign. Accurate data allows businesses to make informed decisions, refine their marketing strategies, and ultimately achieve a higher ROI (Return on Investment).

This dataset provides an array of metrics that are essential for monitoring and analyzing marketing performance over time. Each of these metrics serves as a critical KPI (Key Performance Indicator) that helps marketers better understand the effectiveness of their current marketing activities, as well as guide future strategies.

Date Customer Acquisition Cost (USD) Customer Lifetime Value (USD) Conversion Rate (%) Return on Advertising Spend (Ratio) Organic Traffic Growth (%) Bounce Rate (%) Cost Per Click (USD) Social Media Engagement (Interactions) Email Open Rate (%) Net Promoter Score Total Website Visits New Email Subscriptions Ad Impressions Ad Clicks
2023-01-31 38.75 404.12 3.22 4.22 8.49 54.7 0.98 987 25.42 70.37 5206 151 19914 847
2023-02-28 44.51 593.98 2.28 3.34 9.98 52.75 0.95 1028 26.71 69.1 6038 195 13157 972
2023-03-31 42.32 566.49 2.58 3.13 8.14 54.39 1.07 1035 25.6 70.24 6881 103 15915 730
2023-04-30 40.99 442.47 2.73 4.9 11.64 53.95 0.97 962 26.66 69.53 6577 193 19789 689
2023-05-31 36.56 436.36 2.91 4.93 9.04 50.98 0.96 1038 26.4 71.89 5891 122 12693 724
2023-06-30 36.56 436.68 3.57 4.62 10.65 54.22 1.01 980 24.8 71.4 6484 114 13627 884
2023-07-31 35.58 460.85 2.4 3.61 9.25 45.88 0.93 1035 23.38 70.89 6714 142 19555 876
2023-08-31 43.66 504.95 3.03 3.2 10.08 46.96 1.06 1062 24.48 68.94 6598 128 15450 782
2023-09-30 41.01 486.39 3.18 4.37 10.19 45.45 0.91 1062 25.68 69.02 5863 135 11663 945
2023-10-31 42.08 458.25 2.09 3.88 8.74 48.25 1.1 932 25.66 68.16 5742 112 19721 620

Sample Dataset #2: Marketing KPI Success Assesssment

This dataset serves as a targeted evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) crucial to marketing success. It outlines the 'Minimum Success Criteria' for each KPI and indicates whether the organization has achieved success in that particular metric. Additionally, the dataset provides the percentage deviation from the minimum success criteria, offering a nuanced understanding of performance levels. This dataset is a crucial tool for marketing managers and stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of their marketing strategies, recalibrate goals, and steer decision-making processes.

KPI Minimum Success Criteria Success Achieved? Deviation (%)
Customer Acquisition Cost <= $40 Yes -10%
Customer Lifetime Value >= $500 No +20%
Conversion Rate >= 3% Yes +5%
Return on Advertising Spend >= 4:1 No -15%
Organic Traffic Growth >= 10% monthly Yes +12%
Bounce Rate <= 50% Yes -8%
Cost Per Click <= $1 No +25%
Social Media Engagement >= 1000 interactions Yes +10%
Email Open Rate >= 25% No -5%
Net Promoter Score >= 70 Yes +3%


Sample Dataset #3: User Conversion and Engagement Funnel Analysis

This dataset provides a snapshot of user actions taken during their journey on the platform, from initial landing page visit to potentially signing up and inviting friends. The table highlights key touchpoints, tracking whether a user has visited the landing page, submitted personal and billing information, agreed to the platform's terms, successfully signed up, and invited friends. By examining these behaviors, businesses can understand where potential bottlenecks or drop-offs occur, enabling them to optimize user experience and improve conversion rates.

Success Spectrum: Moving users to more valuable states in a sign-up flow / customer journey

User_ID Landing_Page_Visit Customer_Info_Submitted Billing_Info_Submitted Agreed_to_Terms Signed_Up Invited_Friends Drop-off_Point
User_1 100% 80% 30% 10% 5% 2% Billing_Info
User_2 100% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% -
User_3 100% 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% Landing_Page
User_4 100% 88% 85% 82% 80% 30% Invited_Friends
User_5 100% 75% 55% 10% 5% 0% Agreed_to_Terms


Ambiguity Assessment

Different marketing teams working in silos within the same organization might face challenges in understanding KPIs in the same manner. For example, the digital marketing team could focus on customer acquisition through online channels and might view Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) solely in the context of digital advertising spend. On the other hand, the field marketing team could be engaged in events and face-to-face engagements, where the costs associated with customer acquisition might include event sponsorship, printed materials, and more.

This divergence could lead to different CAC calculations for both teams, even if they are targeting the same customer base. Without a centralized data reporting system or standardized definitions, teams can have a disconnected view of success metrics, making organization-wide decisions difficult and ineffective.

Different teams may have different approaches to calculating and interpreting the Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).

The Digital Marketing Team might consider CAC as the cost spent on digital ads divided by the number of customers acquired through digital channels. Their formula might look like:

\begin{equation} \text{CAC}_{\text{Digital}} = \frac{\text{Total Digital Ad Spend}}{\text{Customers Acquired Through Digital Channels}} \end{equation}

The Field Marketing Team might have a broader view, including costs like event sponsorships, printed materials, and so on. Their formula might be:

\begin{equation} \text{CAC}_{\text{Field}} = \frac{\text{Total Event Sponsorships} + \text{Cost of Printed Materials}}{\text{Customers Acquired Through Field Marketing}} \end{equation}

The above two formulas show that CAC can be calculated in different ways, depending on the focus of the team. This could lead to discrepancies in reported figures, causing challenges in decision-making at an organizational level.

Example of how the data might look like with these different calculations and unresolved ambiguity:

Example of Discrepencies for a Single Marketing Term with 2 Teams: CAC


Month Field Marketing CAC (USD) Digital Marketing CAC (USD) Discrepancy (USD)
January 2023 50.32 38.75 11.57
February 2023 55.23 44.51 10.72
March 2023 53.67 42.32 11.35

Ambiguity in the Measures

Measures define what you're capturing in your data. They articulate the variables that hold specific values. For example, "Cost" measures how much money was expended to acquire a user.

  • Minimum Success Criteria: These are predetermined criteria to assess success. However, it's ambiguous when these should be achieved—daily, weekly, or over some other period.

  • Success Achieved?: While this appears straightforward (Yes/No), it's unclear what should happen if the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) precisely meets the minimum success criteria.

  • Deviation (%): This indicates how far a measure has strayed from a benchmark. The ambiguity lies in not knowing if a higher or lower percentage is favorable and against what benchmark the deviation is calculated.

  • Revenue Generated from Ads in ROAS: The ambiguity here is whether this refers to net or gross revenue.

  • Organic Traffic This Month / Last Month: Specifying actual dates would clear up any confusion about what "this month" or "last month" refers to.

  • Social Media Engagement (Interactions): It's unclear what counts as an "interaction"—likes, shares, comments, or something else.


Ambiguity in the Metrics


Metrics provide a quantifiable means to evaluate measures. For instance, cost can be quantified in terms of USD, EUR, etc.

  • Date Format: Ambiguity can arise if the date format isn't consistent. Also, including the time zone could be crucial for clarity.

  • Currency: Specifying the currency for all monetary metrics can remove ambiguity.

  • Units: For metrics like Conversion Rate and Bounce Rate, stating whether the figures are rounded or truncated can add precision.

  • Time Frame: Without a specified time frame (daily, monthly, yearly), metrics can become ambiguous.

  • Total Visitors in Conversion Rate: Ambiguity arises when it's not clear if this includes repeat visitors, bot traffic, or other specific kinds of visits.

Ambiguities about the Data Quality

Ambiguities in data quality can significantly affect the reliability of analyses.

  • Source of Data: Knowing where the data originates—whether from internal analytics, an industry report, or aggregated from various sources—can add credibility.

  • Statistical Significance: If percentages like Conversion Rate and Bounce Rate aren't statistically validated, their reliability becomes questionable.

  • Normalization: If data comes from different channels, time periods, or customer segments, it's unclear if it has been normalized to enable a meaningful comparison.


Ambiguity in Knowing What Problem to Solve (The Problem with Problems...)

By representing the user as moving from a start to a destination through objectives, or Success Spectrum stages, and connecting those to a financial value, we can begin to understand our problems and define them in a quantified way.


Problem Landscapes: Defining problems and Understanding their Dimensions

In the competitive landscape of digital customer acquisition, understanding the user journey is not just important—it's critical for the sustainability of the business model. A common approach is to envisage the user's interaction as a trajectory from initial landing to a predefined goal, usually linked to conversions or other business objectives. However, understanding this path is often left to qualitative assessments or generic analytics.

Add financial value metrics at each stage of the customer journey, referred to as the 'Success Spectrum,' to quantify and prioritize problems. Calculate the 'Pain Point Cost' which measures the financial impact of user friction or drop-offs at each stage. The sum of 'Value' and 'Pain Point Cost' provides the 'Total Potential of Stage.' The aggregation of these metrics equips us with a complete financial view of user interaction, thereby allowing for data-driven decision-making.

STAGE VALUE PAIN POINT COST TOTAL POTENTIAL OF STAGE TOTAL VALUE OF STAGES TOTAL POTENTIAL VALUE OF STAGES
Landing_Page_Visit $834K $142K $976K $834K $976K
Customer_Info_Submitted $1.25M $675K $2M $2.08M $2.150M
Billing_Info_Submitted $300K $100K $400K $2.38M $2.55M
Agreed_to_Terms $1.5M $300K $1.8M $3.88M $4.35M
Signed_Up $1.2M $100K $1.3M $5.08M $5.65M
Invited_Friends $1M $50K $1.05M $6.08M $6.7M

Removing Ambiguity: Precise Problem Definitions and Solutions

Improve Content

  • Problem Definition: Current engagement rates fall below industry standards, leading to decreased user retention and lower lifetime value.

  • Quantifiable Measure: Run A/B tests focusing on content relevance and UX design, aiming for at least a 20% improvement in the engagement rate.

  • Recommendation: Create segmented content buckets based on user persona and behavior analytics to ensure relevance.

Offer Optimization

  • Problem Definition: The existing range of offers has not captured the full extent of the target market, limiting conversion opportunities.

  • Quantifiable Measure: Experiment with bundled offers, time-sensitive discounts, and loyalty programs aiming for a 15% increase in conversions.

  • Recommendation: Apply machine learning models to predict the most effective offer types for different customer segments.

Trust-building Measures

  • Problem Definition: Initial user research and exit surveys indicate a lack of trust as a key factor in drop-offs.

  • Quantifiable Measure: Implement trust badges and secure payment indicators, aiming for a 10% improvement in trust metrics.

  • Recommendation: Regularly update security protocols and showcase customer testimonials to continually enhance trust.




The Concept Library to the Rescue

The Concept Library serves as a centralized repository that standardizes definitions, metrics, and data-related terminologies. It aims to resolve the existing ambiguities by clearly describing each term, the logic behind its calculation, and providing a unique URL for easy reference.

1. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)

  • Context:
    • Description: This metric represents the average cost to acquire a new customer. The total marketing and sales expenses are divided by the number of new customers acquired in a given period.
    • Source: This data comes from the Field Marketing team's Postgres Database, called "f_marketing_totals", and the tables are "marketing", and "sales"
    • Owner: The person responsible for this data is the head of Field Marketing analytics.
    • Contact info: [email protected]
  • Meaning:
    • Formula: $ CAC = \frac{\text{Total Marketing and Sales Expenses}}{\text{Number of New Customers Acquired}} $
  • Structure:
    • The schema for this concept can be viewed at intelligence.ai/schema/marketing/CAC
    • The JSON Schema example for this data object is:
       // Example JSON Schema for a CAC object
{
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "CAC": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "description": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "A brief explanation of the CAC metric."
        },
        "formula": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "The mathematical formula used to calculate CAC."
        },
        "source": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "The database from which the CAC data originates."
        },
        "owner": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "The person or department responsible for this data."
        },
        "contactInfo": {
          "type": "string",
          "format": "email",
          "description": "Contact information for the data owner."
        },
        "schemaURL": {
          "type": "string",
          "format": "uri",
          "description": "The URL where the schema for this concept can be viewed."
        }
      },
      "required": ["description", "formula", "source", "owner", "contactInfo"]
    }
  },
  "required": ["CAC"]
}

2. Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)

  • Context:
    • Description: CLV calculates the total value a customer will bring over their entire lifecycle.
    • Source: Data collected from Salesforce and stored in MySQL database "customer_metrics"
    • Owner: Head of Customer Analytics
    • Contact info: [email protected]
  • Meaning:
    • Formula: $ CLV = \text{Average Purchase Value} \times \text{Purchase Frequency} \times \text{Customer Lifespan} $
  • Structure:
    • The schema for this concept can be viewed at intelligence.ai/schema/customer/CLV
    • The JSON Schema example for this data object is:
       // Example JSON Schema for a CLV object
       {
           "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
           "type": "object",
           "properties": {
               "CLV": {
                   "type": "object",
                   "properties": {
                       "description": { "type": "string" },
                       "formula": { "type": "string" },
                       "source": { "type": "string" },
                       "owner": { "type": "string" },
                       "contactInfo": { "type": "string", "format": "email" },
                       "schemaURL": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }
                   },
                   "required": ["description", "formula", "source", "owner", "contactInfo"]
               }
           },
           "required": ["CLV"]
       }

3. Conversion Rate

  • Context:
    • Description: This metric measures the percentage of visitors who complete a desired action.
    • Source: Data aggregated from Google Analytics and stored in MongoDB database "site_metrics"
    • Owner: Head of Web Analytics
    • Contact info: [email protected]
  • Meaning:
    • Formula: $ \text{Conversion Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Number of Conversions}}{\text{Total Visitors}} \right) \times 100 $
  • Structure:
    • The schema for this concept can be viewed at intelligence.ai/schema/web/conversion-rate
    • The JSON Schema example for this data object is: 
      // Example JSON Schema for a Conversion Rate object
{
    "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
        "ConversionRate": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "description": { "type": "string" },
                "formula": { "type": "string" },
                "source": { "type": "string" },
                "owner": { "type": "string" },
                "contactInfo": { "type": "string", "format": "email" },
                "schemaURL": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }
            },
            "required": ["description", "formula", "source", "owner", "contactInfo"]
        }
    },
    "required": ["ConversionRate"]
}