New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

You only need \int w(x) dx to use back substitution #102

Open

dlfivefifty opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 1 comment

Member

dlfivefifty commented Nov 16, 2017

We don't need any Stieltjes moments for back substitution.

We also only need one Stieltjes moment for forward substitution

Member Author

dlfivefifty commented Nov 16, 2017 •

edited

Loading

Is Clenshaw stable for all z? No.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment