You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are good reasons for this - G is not very well behaved.
However, the response of a dashpot to an imposed ramp and other continuous deformations can't be calculated as a result, at least with the current method.
This became a problem when Eleni tried to breakdown the behaviour the response of a model by extracting stress and strain on each component.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The way RHEOS currently computes things - I don't think it's appropriate to add in the dashpot relaxation modulus.
There are exact cases we can compute by hand but for a more general method we need to implement one or both of the approaches described in my thesis (i.e. integration by parts, differential equation based fits).
There are good reasons for this - G is not very well behaved.
However, the response of a dashpot to an imposed ramp and other continuous deformations can't be calculated as a result, at least with the current method.
This became a problem when Eleni tried to breakdown the behaviour the response of a model by extracting stress and strain on each component.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: