Test rules

[hmuniz]

In 4dca2b I solved the merge conflict and tested the corte-e-costura function.

The test was done using this conllu file and these rules:

(=> ((?a (= upostag "ADV") (= lemma "além"))
     *
     (?b (= lemma "ter")))
    ((?b (+ lemma "============"))))

(=> (?a (= lemma "liberdade") (= upostag "NOUN"))
    (?a (! upostag "===========")))

(=> ((?a (= lemma "trabalho"))
     ?
     (?b (= lemma "passar"))
     ?
     (?c (= lemma "em")))
    ((?a (! lemma "============"))))

[arademaker]

Não entendi o operador ?, o * quer dizer "um ou mais tokens" mas o ? ? Ele refere-se à opcionalidade do token anterior ou posterior? A notação não está boa.

[GPPassos]

I'm sorry, but what is the issue here? Is this just a report on what was done?

[arademaker]

Yes, @GPPassos , @hmuniz should have had created the issue before the code and report the evolution here, but since he didn't do it, I asked him to open the issue anyway. Github does not send alerts for commits, only for updates in the issues.

[GPPassos]

Oh, no problem! It'd just be good to have a brief description of the problem as well in order to have a record

[arademaker]

I agree

[GPPassos]

@hmuniz Sorry if it's a silly question, but on https://github.com/own-pt/cl-conllu/blob/4dca2bd80734df85ef30b94b226892cd78b10a68/rules.lisp#L9 what do rls and rhs stand for?
I'd think that rhs means "right-hand side", but then instead of rls shouldn't it be lhs (left-hand side)?

[arademaker]

the corte-costura based rules were implemented, but I believe #50 can be more useful in the future. Anyway, it seems this issue was already solved.

[arademaker]

implemented by @Kalysthos closing it.