want to correct 2 sentences in the artical

[Hangoi]

hi

i want to correct 2 points:
1.
"The calculated average cost is then applied to the inventory decreases for the item (or item, location, and variant) with posting dates in the average cost period. If any inventory increases exist that were fixed applied to inventory decreases in the average cost period, then the calculated average cost is forwarded from the increase to the decrease."

is it incorrect in the last sentence?
the right sentence is: "the calculated average cost is forwarded from the decrease to the increase "
2.

The scenario number 3 is Negative but in your table It is Positive
the scenario number 4 is Positive but in your table it is Negative

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: 1bfc832f-6fa5-c7ae-a897-2a2e10e45b72
• Version Independent ID: 37f55d20-4e14-d0ee-b2fc-13e3b44bd394
• Content: Design Details - Average Cost - Dynamics NAV App
• Content Source: dynamics-nav-app/design-details-average-cost.md
• Product: dynamics-nav-2018
• GitHub Login: @SorenGP
• Microsoft Alias: edupont

[edupont04]

Hello,
Thank you for your feedback! My colleague who originally wrote this article many years ago is no longer with the company. However, I think he would say that you are not right in your two proposals, but that your confusion is probably caused by the very convoluted wording in the article. I had to read the sentences multiple times, myself, so please bear with me.

1. The meaning of the sentence is that there in an increase in inventory, and that the average cost must be updated based on the increase. But that the new inventory items are fixed applied to a pre-existing decrease in inventory. I think that is what is meant with "the calculated average cost is forwarded from the increase to the decrease."...

2. Scenario 3 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is positive, the posting date is earlier than the latest valuation date of applied value entries, and there is no revaluation. Whereas Scenario 4 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is negative, and there is a revaluation. Again, the description is convoluted, but I believe it matches the description in the field Help here: https://docs.microsoft.com/previous-versions/dynamicsnav-2016/hh893767(v=nav.90).

[Hangoi]

Hi Eva,

1. these sentences is your colleague was mentioned about the unit cost of item on Posted sale credit memo that applied direct to Posted Sale invoice, do you agree this with me?
   So the transactions are on Posted sale credit memo are increases in Inventory
   and the transaction are on Posted sale invoice are decreases in inventory
   So when increases are fixed applied to decreases,
   example, the unit cost on Posted sale invoice is $10 --> so unit cost on Posted sale credit memo is $10, is it right?
   the average cost is forwarded from Decrease to Increase ?

2
Scenario 3 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is positive, the posting date is earlier than the latest valuation date of applied value entries, and there is no revaluation
Could you pls check it one more time? If Scenario 3 is Positive and no Revaluation, so scenario 3 is belong scenario 1, do you agree with me?
Scenario 1 means that all entries type is positive, no revaluation and don't care posting date so Valuation date is always posting date.

Whereas Scenario 4 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is negative, and there is a revaluation
The function on Item Revaluation Journal do not allow user choosing a negative entries, so do you see the conflict?

[Hangoi]

Hi Eva Do you have any documents that tell about forwarding cost mechanism for Output journal?

…

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:41 PM Eva Dupont ***@***.***> wrote: Hello, Thank you for your feedback! My colleague who originally wrote this article many years ago is no longer with the company. However, I think he would say that you are not right in your two proposals, but that your confusion is probably caused by the very convoluted wording in the article. I had to read the sentences multiple times, myself, so please bear with me. 1. The meaning of the sentence is that there in an increase in inventory, and that the average cost must be updated based on the increase. But that the new inventory items are fixed applied to a pre-existing decrease in inventory. I *think* that is what is meant with "the calculated average cost is forwarded from the increase to the decrease."... 2. Scenario 3 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is positive, the posting date is earlier than the latest valuation date of applied value entries, and there is no revaluation. Whereas Scenario 4 is about what happens to the Valuation Date field on the value entry if the valued quantity is negative, and there is a revaluation. Again, the description is convoluted, but I believe it matches the description in the field Help here: https://docs.microsoft.com/previous-versions/dynamicsnav-2016/hh893767(v=nav.90) . — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#130 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO2NIJXRPNLW2RXKJEMRFQLSROZXFANCNFSM4T3ESEPA> .