Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why readmission prediction result lower than GCT's paper #8

Open
LeslieHoloway opened this issue Mar 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Why readmission prediction result lower than GCT's paper #8

LeslieHoloway opened this issue Mar 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@LeslieHoloway
Copy link

In your paper, the result of the readmission task based on eICU dataset is 0.3986. GCT's AUPRC is 0.3794.
image

But in GCT paper (Learning the Graphical Structure of Electronic Health Records with
Graph Convolutional Transformer)
, the result of the readmission task based on eICU dataset is 0.5313.
image

What makes such a difference?
I ran both codes from your repo and theirs. I found out that the results were close to yours.

@jackzhu727
Copy link
Collaborator

I met the same problem when I was doing the experiment referring to the repo you mentioned, so I only reported the result from the code. I also notice "shallow" method in the table above has a closer result in terms of scale, but I don't really know the reason for the gap.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants