Missing leaf to indicate working or protection state of a board

[alfredogonzalezmuniz]

Reviewing the tapi-equipment model the "common-actual-properties" container needs a leaf for the protection-status of the card. Mainly for cross-connect boards but also for others

leaf is-protected {
type enumeration {
enum WORKING {
description
“Working board with a backup board";
}
enum PROTECTION {
description
" Protection board ready for backup in case of failure of the working board ";
}
enum NO_PROTECTED {
description
" Simple board without protection or backup board ";
}
}
description
“Crossconnetion boards and other protected boards need to expose the status of the protection and wich is the working and the protection board in a 1+1 or a 1+N protection scenario";

[arthurMll]

Additionally, it would be required to add further status information across the whole equipment model.

Taking as a reference the IETF yang model for Hardware Management https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8348/, it may be worthy to analyze to include similar information in TAPI too.