Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is Epithelioma a syn for sebaceous adenoma #2

Open
cmungall opened this issue Aug 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Why is Epithelioma a syn for sebaceous adenoma #2

cmungall opened this issue Aug 10, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link

Migrated from:
monarch-initiative/monarch-disease-ontology-RETIRED#105

[Term]
id: MPATH:230
name: sebaceous adenoma
namespace: mouse_pathology.ontology
def: "Adenoma of sebaceous cells; regular architecture of gland not mantained. Large numbers of immature germinative cells present. Mitoses. (M-8410/0)." [Pathbase:_Curation]
***synonym: "Epithelioma" RELATED [Pathbase:_Curation]
is_a: MPATH:219  ! adnexal and skin appendage tumor
is_a: MPATH:270  ! adenoma

seems way too generic to attach as a synonym

should there not be a generic epithelial neoplasm as a distinct concept in MPATH?

current linearized graph is:

 / MPATH:0 ! pathological entity
  is_a MPATH:603 ! pathological anatomical entity
   is_a MPATH:218 ! neoplasm
    is_a MPATH:219 ! adnexal and skin appendage tumor
     is_a MPATH:230 ! sebaceous adenoma ***  [SYNONYM: "Epithelioma" (related)]
    is_a MPATH:267 ! glandular tumor
     is_a MPATH:270 ! adenoma
      is_a MPATH:230 ! sebaceous adenoma ***  [SYNONYM: "Epithelioma" (related)]
    is_a MPATH:556 ! potentially cancerous lesions
     is_a MPATH:270 ! adenoma
      is_a MPATH:230 ! sebaceous adenoma ***  [SYNONYM: "Epithelioma" (related)]

Seems it would be most appropriate to attach this syn to MPATH:219

MPATH:219 ! adnexal and skin appendage tumor [DEF: "Tumors of the skin, its constituent structures and glands including the mammary gland, apocrine and eccrine glands, hair follicles and associated structures."

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

matentzn commented Aug 5, 2019

@cmungall this still important?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants