You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@jonniedie@YingboMa@ChrisRackauckas Are LagrangianSystem and HamiltonianSystem still desired in ModelingToolkit? I've been working on integrating galactic potential equations (in the integral / scalar form), and I created a new ScalarField subtype of AbstractTimeDependentSystem for this purpose. I think HamiltonianSystem would be more appropriate, and I'd be interested in helping to contribute this type if it's still desired in the SciML ecosystem.
I think it would be nice to have these alternative system forms, making it easier to generate the equations of motion. I'd be happy to review PRs around it but never got to it myself.
Based on this here's a first crack at how to handle Lagrangian systems.
When @YingboMa gets this stuff implemented, I can open up a PR along these lines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: