Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend to count/binary data using GLMs? #90

Open
sdwfrost opened this issue May 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Extend to count/binary data using GLMs? #90

sdwfrost opened this issue May 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sdwfrost
Copy link

sdwfrost commented May 5, 2021

I don't know much about ESNs beyond the basics, but I was wondering whether there are any barriers to switching from linear models to generalized linear models to allow time series of e.g. count data to be considered? This could involve using MLJGLMInterface.jl, though it doesn't have penalized models, or GLMNet.jl, which does have penalized models but may be more work to link, given the current codebase links to MLJLinearModels.jl.

@MartinuzziFrancesco
Copy link
Member

From a theoretical point of view I don't see any barriers to implement support for generalized linear models. Giving support for both the packages could be doable regardless of current implementations, I think I will delve into it in the next week. Do you already have some data you wanted to test this on?

@sdwfrost
Copy link
Author

Hi @MartinuzziFrancesco

Thanks for looking into this. I've put a toy example in a gist here.

@MartinuzziFrancesco
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the example, I should be able to properly tackle this in the next days!

@sdwfrost
Copy link
Author

I've updated the gist to include some dummy data in binary format too.

@MartinuzziFrancesco MartinuzziFrancesco added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants