We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lines 436 and 437 f_equation_x = u_t + (u * u_x + v * u_y) + lam1 * p_x - lam2 * (u_xx + u_yy) f_equation_y = v_t + (u * v_x + v * v_y) + lam1 * p_y - lam2 * (v_xx + v_yy) Should it be changed to f_equation_x = u_t + lam1 * (u * u_x + v * u_y) + p_x - lam2 * (u_xx + u_yy) f_equation_y = v_t + lam1 * (u * v_x + v * v_y) + p_y - lam2 * (v_xx + v_yy) ??????????
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, it's essentially the same when testing the inverse problem
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Lines 436 and 437
f_equation_x = u_t + (u * u_x + v * u_y) + lam1 * p_x - lam2 * (u_xx + u_yy)
f_equation_y = v_t + (u * v_x + v * v_y) + lam1 * p_y - lam2 * (v_xx + v_yy)
Should it be changed to
f_equation_x = u_t + lam1 * (u * u_x + v * u_y) + p_x - lam2 * (u_xx + u_yy)
f_equation_y = v_t + lam1 * (u * v_x + v * v_y) + p_y - lam2 * (v_xx + v_yy)
??????????
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: