Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for storing PK maps from OncoQuant #53

Open
fedorov opened this issue Jun 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Add support for storing PK maps from OncoQuant #53

fedorov opened this issue Jun 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Jun 17, 2015

The idea is to organize results of OncoQuant in the same hierarchy for different options of PK analysis as below:

└── RESOURCES
    ├── 1
    │   └── Reconstructions
    │       ├── 1.nrrd
    │       └── 1.xml
    ├── 100 (where type is SUB)
    │   ├── Reconstructions
    │   │   ├── 100.nrrd
    │   │   └── 100.xml
    │   └── Segmentations
    │        └── readerId-StructureName-datetime.nrrd
    │   ├── OncoQuant
    │       └── version-selectionofaif-MapName-datetime.nrrd

where selectionofaif is one of the following: Auto, ManualLeftArteryROI, ManualRightArteryROI, Model. DCE series should be used to run the analysis, but the results should be saved under SUB series in OncoQuant folder.

The result should be a bash or python script that takes on input the locaiton of PCampReview-style dataset, and adds OncoQuant directory with the maps. The following maps should be saved: Ktrans, ve, BAT, Rsqr, Auc, MaxSlope

@che85 che85 self-assigned this Jun 17, 2015
@fedorov fedorov assigned mehrtash and unassigned che85 Jun 17, 2015
@fedorov fedorov added this to the June-2015 milestone Jun 18, 2015
@mehrtash
Copy link
Member

@fedorov Where is the best place to store the OncoQunt nrrd reconsecration files (nrrd image and dce MR parameters text file)? In the same reconstruction folder(A) or in a separate folder (B)? or probably out of the studies tree?

A:

└── RESOURCES
    ├── 1
    │   └── Reconstructions
    │       ├── 1.nrrd
    │       └── 1.xml
    │       ├── 1_DCE.nrrd
    │       └── 1_DCE_MR_Parameters.txt

B:

└── RESOURCES
    ├── 1
    │   └── Reconstructions
    │       ├── 1.nrrd
    │       └── 1.xml
    │   └── Reconstructions_OncoQuant    
    │       ├── 1.nrrd
    │       └── 1_MR_Parameters.txt

Please also comment on file naming for oncoquant reconstructions. There is also a chance that the new hierarchy structure breaks the rest of PcampReview functionality. E.g. here and other places in utils and so on.

@fedorov
Copy link
Member Author

fedorov commented Jun 30, 2015

I think we should keep these reconstructions in OncoQuant folder, side by side with the PK maps. For naming, let's use <series_number>.nrrd and <series_number>_parameters.txt. This should also have less chances of breaking the code, if it is all in OncoQuant folder.

@rweiss42
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 Existing code is looking for an OncoQuant dir and I like that there's more of a difference in the dir name. https://github.com/fedorov/PCampReview/blob/master/PCampReview.py#L1151

@fedorov
Copy link
Member Author

fedorov commented Jun 30, 2015

apparently, github formatting garbled some of the content.

I meant to say let's use begin quote series number end quote underscore .nrrd for the reconstruction saved in OncoQuant folder, and begin quote series number end quote underscore begin quote parameters end quote .nrrd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants