You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be better to get the transfer functions to sample evenly in $g^\ast$ instead of in $\theta$.
The proposed algorithm change is
estimate gmin gmax coarsely.
for $g^\ast$ in set of target $g^\ast$, root find for radius, then root find over $\theta$ for the corresponding $g^\ast$.
An issue that might crop up here are those transfer functions where the inferred extrema are worse than the area extrema. In these cases we normally see an error of 1e-4 or so, but that could still be quite damaging to the calculation. Perhaps, however, we can spend more time in the extrema optimizer at the trade off of needing fewer $g^\ast$ than theta to sample the transfer functions fully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be better to get the transfer functions to sample evenly in$g^\ast$ instead of in $\theta$ .
The proposed algorithm change is
An issue that might crop up here are those transfer functions where the inferred extrema are worse than the area extrema. In these cases we normally see an error of 1e-4 or so, but that could still be quite damaging to the calculation. Perhaps, however, we can spend more time in the extrema optimizer at the trade off of needing fewer$g^\ast$ than theta to sample the transfer functions fully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: