You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much for developing this amazing tool that enables the haplotype-resolved genome assembly.
Previous studies show that hifiasm can successfully seperate X and Y contigs into two haplotypes. However, since there are pseduautosomal regions (PAR) on the X and Y share homologous sequences, it is possible that there are switch errors when phasing X and Y contigs. In this case, how should I evaluate the switch error rates between the X and Y contigs in two haplotypes?
Thanks you so much in advances!
Best,
Lin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @Lin-Yuying , sorry for the late reply. Trio-binning assembly should be fine in most. Without parental data, Hi-C contact or reference-guided curation might work.
Thank you so much for your reply and sorry for being confusing in the original post.
I did run Hifiasm with HiC mode, and except this, I am wondering if there is a seperate way that I can identify the switch errors from two assembled haplotypes, especially the sex chromsome regions.
Hi Haoyu,
Thank you so much for developing this amazing tool that enables the haplotype-resolved genome assembly.
Previous studies show that hifiasm can successfully seperate X and Y contigs into two haplotypes. However, since there are pseduautosomal regions (PAR) on the X and Y share homologous sequences, it is possible that there are switch errors when phasing X and Y contigs. In this case, how should I evaluate the switch error rates between the X and Y contigs in two haplotypes?
Thanks you so much in advances!
Best,
Lin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: