Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider merging datagovuk/ckanext-ga-report #8

Open
rossjones opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Consider merging datagovuk/ckanext-ga-report #8

rossjones opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@rossjones
Copy link
Contributor

The https://github.com/datagovuk/ckanext-ga-report extension provides usage information and charts based on the information collected in GA (see http://data.gov.uk/data/site-usage for the information we collect). It may well be worth merging into this repository (which will definitely need some work) as they are most definitely related.

@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member

Seems a good idea. Would you be up for overseeing a merge?

@rossjones
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this is being re-written at DGU to be cleaner because it got out of hand really quickly.

On further reflection I don't think this should be a plugin at all. I think the key code for embedding GA codes (or Piwik codes) should be managed directly in core. Having the code in another extension is just a pain. The code for other stuff should be put into a 'ckanext-reports' package for generating publisher reports. This should also contain the ckanext-qa reports (so that qa can be more easily merged with archiver).

@nigelbabu
Copy link
Contributor

@rossjones The more complex analytics features that we advertise don't work anymore, so I'm happy to work with you on a merge if you're interested.

@rossjones
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think a merge of the GA stuff makes sense. I need it needs fixing another way.

Reports on usage are a key feature for publishers. And that's what ga_reports provides, but it is such a heinous mess that I think it's just delaying the inevitable. I'd definitely suggest fixing the complex parts another way, or waiting until DGU have finished their rework (which I believe uses Pandas).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants