Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more validation checks #4

Open
sudoBash418 opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Add more validation checks #4

sudoBash418 opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@sudoBash418
Copy link
Member

sudoBash418 commented Nov 13, 2022

AKA invent new, exciting ways to break everything
We can always use more validation checks - Some Smart Guy, probably.

I can't think of all the ways a challenge could realistically be broken or otherwise not work as expected.

If anyone wants to help out here, just let me know if you think of a check we could use and I'll add it - or make a PR and I'll relentlessly rewrite your code merge it in.

Relevant source code is mostly in cctk/sources/challenge.py at the moment.

@sudoBash418 sudoBash418 changed the title ~~Invent new, exciting ways to break everything~~ Add more validation checks Add more validation checks Nov 13, 2022
@sudoBash418 sudoBash418 added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Nov 13, 2022
@sudoBash418 sudoBash418 removed the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant