Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REML vs ML: Which one is better? #3

Open
dataandcrowd opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

REML vs ML: Which one is better? #3

dataandcrowd opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@dataandcrowd
Copy link
Owner

dataandcrowd commented Jun 7, 2019

Desciption on thesis

The most popular options in GAM are REML (restricted/residual estimated maximum likelihood) and ML (maximum likelihood). The difference between the two methods is that REML is likely to be biased for the fixed effects but unbiased for the random effects, while ML is likely to be unbiased for the fixed effects but biased for the random effects. That is, REML estimates will have different mean values depending of the number of parameters but have less variances, whilst ML is vice versa. However, the difference becomes negligible when the sample size is large.

Example

  • REML
    GAM

  • ML
    GAM_ML

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant