Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sweden/Luxembourg: Support decimals for phase_power_current_l* #1641

Open
dennissiemensma opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
review Not sure yet whether to implement this

Comments

@dennissiemensma
Copy link
Member

Feature

These are integers in the DSMR-protocol, but not in Sweden not Luxembourg:

  • phase_power_current_l1
  • phase_power_current_l2
  • phase_power_current_l3

Consider converting it to decimals, even though it will hit a lot and also cause a lot of trouble in keep it compatible with existing data, so it may not happen.

Reported in #1394 / #1533.


1-0:31.7.0(011.7*A)
1-0:51.7.0(000.3*A)
1-0:71.7.0(009.2*A)

/FLU5\253769484_A

1-0:31.7.0(001.06*A)
1-0:51.7.0(002.07*A)
1-0:71.7.0(001.47*A)

/KAM5

0-0:1.0.0(220120135735W)
1-0:1.8.0(00000184.554*kWh)
1-0:2.8.0(00000000.000*kWh)
1-0:3.8.0(00000001.082*kVArh)
1-0:4.8.0(00000091.984*kVArh)
1-0:1.7.0(0004.795*kW)
1-0:2.7.0(0000.000*kW)
1-0:3.7.0(0000.000*kVAr)
1-0:4.7.0(0000.079*kVAr)
1-0:21.7.0(0002.619*kW)
1-0:41.7.0(0000.073*kW)
1-0:61.7.0(0002.103*kW)
1-0:22.7.0(0000.000*kW)
1-0:42.7.0(0000.000*kW)
1-0:62.7.0(0000.000*kW)
1-0:23.7.0(0000.000*kVAr)
1-0:43.7.0(0000.000*kVAr)
1-0:63.7.0(0000.000*kVAr)
1-0:24.7.0(0000.010*kVAr)
1-0:44.7.0(0000.028*kVAr)
1-0:64.7.0(0000.041*kVAr)
1-0:32.7.0(228.2*V)
1-0:52.7.0(230.2*V)
1-0:72.7.0(228.6*V)
1-0:31.7.0(011.7*A)
1-0:51.7.0(000.3*A)
1-0:71.7.0(009.2*A)
!232C
@dennissiemensma dennissiemensma added the review Not sure yet whether to implement this label Jun 8, 2022
@dennissiemensma dennissiemensma added this to the Some future release milestone Jun 8, 2022
@dennissiemensma dennissiemensma removed this from the Some future release milestone Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review Not sure yet whether to implement this
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant