-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Paper Writing: Methods - The Open-source Effort [in need of review] #1006
Comments
I can help with review and also added a few changes, but here are some general comments.
And the overall goal of this section is a bit unclear to me. A lot of things are mentioned superficially, or referred to only in appendix. How detailed we want it to be? Another question is whether entire "Methods" should really be before "Related Work" as we draw some inspiration from earlier community driven initiatives that are discussed there, so it could read more easily building upon that. |
Would be lovely!
I agree. We should probably do this at the end though. Focus on the main narrative points to start with
I believe it is related to the open-source effort. Do you have another suggestion on where to put it
I would welcome a rewrite if you have a good one - One thing I am afraid of is reviewers getting too caught up on the specifics of a non-perfect point system (we know it is - it can't be perfect).
We can probably be more clear I agree. However near perfect scores vary from metric to metric though I think most people would understand it as a score close to the maximum of what would be possible for the task (often close to 1). Again a reformulation is very welcome
Again def. welcome to suggest a rewrite here |
@imenelydiaker already did good work here. I added a few additional things.
@imenelydiaker do you mind taking a look at this again?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: