Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"wrong sign in 'by' argument" while runnning nanodisco motif #72

Open
monxac opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

"wrong sign in 'by' argument" while runnning nanodisco motif #72

monxac opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@monxac
Copy link

monxac commented May 31, 2023

Hi,

i'm trying to run the nanodisco motif script but i get this error,

[2023-05-31 13:21:36] Prepare output folder.
[2023-05-31 13:21:36] Load supplied current differences.
[2023-05-31 13:21:37] Detect motifs.
[2023-05-31 13:21:37] Processing statistical signal.
Error in do.ply(i) : task 12 failed - "wrong sign in 'by' argument"
Calls: wrapper.motif.detection ... ddply -> ldply -> llply -> ->
Execution halted

the current difference file looks normal, it has lots of NA, but there is data for some chunks, here are the first lines as an example

1 | megahit_805628 | 1 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
2 | megahit_3546264 | 1 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
3 | megahit_3546264 | 5001 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
4 | megahit_7415660 | 1 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
5 | megahit_3033896 | 1 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
6 | megahit_3033896 | 5001 | rev | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
7 | megahit_3033896 | 12402 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
8 | megahit_3033896 | 12404 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
9 | megahit_3033896 | 12405 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
10 | megahit_3033896 | 12406 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
11 | megahit_3033896 | 12411 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
12 | megahit_3033896 | 12415 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
13 | megahit_3033896 | 12416 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
14 | megahit_3033896 | 12420 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
15 | megahit_3033896 | 12423 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
16 | megahit_3033896 | 12424 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
17 | megahit_3033896 | 12427 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
18 | megahit_3033896 | 12428 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
19 | megahit_3033896 | 12429 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
20 | megahit_3033896 | 12430 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
21 | megahit_3033896 | 12431 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
22 | megahit_3033896 | 12432 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
23 | megahit_3033896 | 12433 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
24 | megahit_3033896 | 12434 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
25 | megahit_3033896 | 12435 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
26 | megahit_3033896 | 12436 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
27 | megahit_3033896 | 12437 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
28 | megahit_3033896 | 12438 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
29 | megahit_3033896 | 12439 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
30 | megahit_3033896 | 12440 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
31 | megahit_3033896 | 12441 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
32 | megahit_3033896 | 12442 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
33 | megahit_3033896 | 12443 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
34 | megahit_3033896 | 12444 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
35 | megahit_3033896 | 12445 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA
36 | megahit_3033896 | 12446 | fwd | t | 6 | 16 | -1.8615509 | 0.0615589 | 0.070095
37 | megahit_3033896 | 12447 | fwd | t | 8 | 9 | -7.3153943 | 0.0147895 | 0.0206499
38 | megahit_3033896 | 12448 | fwd | t | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA

i've tried looking at the functions the error message is reffering to, to understand what is causing the errror, i think it's in this part of rollingFunction, called within the wrapper.motif.detection function:

genomic_position_range <- seq(min(genomic_position),max(genomic_position))

, but i don't see what is causing the problem,

would someone know what the problem is?

thank you in advance,

@touala
Copy link
Member

touala commented Jul 24, 2023

Hello @monxac,

Sorry for the massive delay. It looks like the coverage is quite low for the couple contigs you showed. Could you produce the summary for the complete difference dataset with summary(readRDS(<path_to_rds>))?

Thank you,

Alan

@monxac
Copy link
Author

monxac commented Jul 25, 2023

summary.csv
Hi! thank you for your answer,

i've attached the a document with the results of summary,

thank you,

Xavier

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants