Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3 Still in osv #2332

Closed
zhangzhenyu2 opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3 Still in osv #2332

zhangzhenyu2 opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@zhangzhenyu2
Copy link

GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3 "Runc allows an arbitrary systemd property to be injected" is a misunderstood vulnerability. Users do NOT need to update runc

opencontainers/runc#4263

but
https://storage.googleapis.com/osv-vulnerabilities/index.html?prefix=Go/
Still in osv

@michaelkedar
Copy link
Member

michaelkedar commented Jun 25, 2024

The JSON record for GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3 has it marked as withdrawn:

"id": "GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3",
"modified": "2024-06-05T18:30:34Z",
"published": "2024-04-26T06:30:34Z",
"withdrawn": "2024-04-30T09:37:23Z",

I believe it is intended that we export withdrawn vulnerabilities.

Edit: Found the relevant FAQ entry: https://google.github.io/osv.dev/faq/#how-does-osvdev-handle-withdrawn-records

@michaelkedar michaelkedar reopened this Jun 25, 2024
@cuixq cuixq added the data quality Issues with data quality label Jul 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

✨ Thank you for your interest in OSV.dev's data quality! ✨

Please review our FAQ entry on how to most efficiently have this addressed.

@andrewpollock
Copy link
Contributor

Based on:

https://osv.dev/GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3 clearly marks the record as withdrawn
and
https://osv.dev/GHSA-c5pj-mqfh-rvc3.json has the withdrawn field set

I don't think there is anything actionable here. As @michaelkedar has pointed out, the behaviour of the withdrawn field is documented in the FAQ so I don't believe there is anything actionable here. Please reopen with specifics if you feel differently.

@andrewpollock andrewpollock removed the data quality Issues with data quality label Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants