Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inference results didn't perform as expected #25

Open
yliyli opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Inference results didn't perform as expected #25

yliyli opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@yliyli
Copy link

yliyli commented May 30, 2024

Hi Haoning,

I was trying inference.py, annd the results seem to be underperforming. I was wondering if you could help me check if I did everything correctly. I downloaded checkpoint_Story from https://huggingface.co/haoningwu/StoryGen/tree/main, and downloaded all requirements from environmenbt.yaml with some problems with packages that required c++ (libtorch_cuda_cu.so and xformers). Then I ran with these parameters:
image

The results looked somewhat like this:
image

The boy and the dog are all very different from the images I provided. Could you give more guide in terms of how to use inference.py, difference between "multi-image-condition" and "auto-regressive", and if I used the inputs correctly? Or these degradation are results from the c++ packages? I feel that's less likely though, since they appear to be packages for efficiency.

Thanks a lot!

@haoningwu3639
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the late response, it seems that you are trying to generate with multiple reference characters, which is a more challenging problem. In the supplementary of our paper, we provide an example of multi-character generation, but it is slightly less stable than single-character generation because we have not trained specifically for this situation.
Also, I recommend you use auto-regressive manner rather than multi-image-condition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants