Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle cases where package repo URLs might have different protocol (s… #3

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

hbmartin
Copy link
Owner

…sh or https) and/or .git suffix

@hbmartin
Copy link
Owner Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.21429% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.96%. Comparing base (5e5c3f7) to head (4977633).

Files Patch % Lines
lib/spm_version_updates/git.rb 94.73% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #3      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.87%   94.96%   +7.08%     
==========================================
  Files           3        5       +2     
  Lines         132      139       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          116      132      +16     
+ Misses         16        7       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

2, because the changes are mostly focused on handling different URL formats for package repositories and removing redundant code. The logic is straightforward, and the modifications are well-scoped.

🧪 Relevant tests

Yes

🔍 Possible issues

Possible Bug: The trim_repo_url method removes the protocol and .git suffix from URLs, which might lead to incorrect URL handling if the repository URL contains these elements in other parts of the URL.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion      

Consider using a more robust URL parsing method to handle edge cases where .git or protocol identifiers appear in other parts of the URL. Ruby's URI module can parse and manipulate URLs more reliably. [important]

relevant linerepo_url.split("://").last.gsub(/\.git$/, "")

relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion      

Ensure that XcodeprojPathMustBeSet is a defined exception and provides a clear error message to the user about the missing Xcode project path. This improves the user experience by providing a clear and actionable error message. [important]

relevant lineraise(XcodeprojPathMustBeSet) if xcodeproj_path.nil?

relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion      

Replace direct puts calls with a more flexible logging mechanism to control the verbosity of the output. This allows users to enable or disable verbose logging as needed. [medium]

relevant lineputs(resolved_versions)

relevant filespec/spm_version_updates_spec.rb
suggestion      

Add more test cases to cover scenarios where the URL contains .git or protocol identifiers in different parts of the URL, not just at the beginning or end. This ensures the trim_repo_url method works correctly in all cases. [important]

relevant lineit "Does report new versions with ssh and/or .git URLs" do


✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, require_can_be_split_review, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @hbmartin - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

General suggestions:

  • Consider implementing comprehensive validation for the xcodeproj_path to ensure it is not only non-nil but also valid and points to an existing file.
  • Refine the logging strategy to use a structured logging framework for better control and consistency across different environments.
  • Ensure the trim_repo_url function robustly handles all expected URL formats, including edge cases, to prevent data processing issues.
  • Expand test coverage to include negative test cases for URL handling, ensuring the system gracefully handles malformed or unexpected URLs.
  • Add test cases to verify the behavior when repositories are explicitly ignored, ensuring they are not processed even if new versions are available.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 5 issues found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟡 Testing: 2 issues found
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -34,11 +34,14 @@ class DangerSpmVersionUpdates < Plugin
# The path to your Xcode project
# @return [void]
def check_for_updates(xcodeproj_path)
remote_packages = get_remote_package(xcodeproj_path)
raise(XcodeprojPathMustBeSet) if xcodeproj_path.nil?
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Consider validating xcodeproj_path for more than just nil.

It might be beneficial to also check if the path is not empty and points to an existing file to prevent runtime errors later.

resolved_versions = get_resolved_versions(xcodeproj_path)
$stderr.puts("Found resolved versions for #{resolved_versions.size} packages")

puts(resolved_versions)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Consider using a more descriptive logging method.

Directly using puts might not be ideal for production code. It could be more appropriate to use a logging framework that can be configured for different environments.

remote_packages.each { |repository_url, requirement|
puts(repository_url)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Ensure consistent logging levels and methods.

Similar to the previous comment, consider using a structured logging approach instead of puts for better control and consistency.

@@ -93,7 +86,7 @@ def get_resolved_versions(xcodeproj_path)
resolved_versions = resolved_paths.map { |resolved_path|
JSON.load_file!(resolved_path)["pins"]
.to_h { |pin|
[pin["location"], pin["state"]["version"] || pin["state"]["revision"]]
[trim_repo_url(pin["location"]), pin["state"]["version"] || pin["state"]["revision"]]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Ensure trim_repo_url handles all URL formats correctly.

Given the method trim_repo_url is used to process repository URLs, it's crucial to ensure it correctly handles various URL formats, including those with or without protocols, and with different domain extensions.

Comment on lines 121 to 126
# Removes protocol and trailing .git from a repo URL
# @param [String] repo_url
# The URL of the repository
# @return [String]
def trim_repo_url(repo_url)
repo_url.split("://").last.gsub(/\.git$/, "")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Validate the trim_repo_url method's robustness.

It's important to ensure that trim_repo_url can handle edge cases, such as URLs that might not follow standard patterns, to avoid any potential data processing issues.

@@ -212,6 +212,22 @@ module Danger
@my_plugin.check_for_updates("#{File.dirname(__FILE__)}/support/fixtures/NoPackagesResolved.xcodeproj")
}.to raise_error(CouldNotFindResolvedFile)
end

it "Does report new versions with ssh and/or .git URLs" do
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (testing): Consider adding negative test cases for URL handling.

It's great to see a test case for positive scenarios where URLs with ssh and/or .git are handled correctly. However, to ensure robustness, consider adding negative test cases as well. For instance, test cases where the URL is malformed or does not follow the expected pattern. This will help ensure that the URL trimming and protocol handling are resilient to unexpected inputs.

@@ -212,6 +212,22 @@ module Danger
@my_plugin.check_for_updates("#{File.dirname(__FILE__)}/support/fixtures/NoPackagesResolved.xcodeproj")
}.to raise_error(CouldNotFindResolvedFile)
end

it "Does report new versions with ssh and/or .git URLs" do
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (testing): Test case lacks verification for ignored repositories.

This test case effectively checks for the handling of URLs with different protocols and suffixes. However, it seems to miss the verification for scenarios where repositories are explicitly ignored (via ignore_repos). Adding a test case to ensure that ignored repositories are not processed, even if they have new versions available, would enhance the coverage and ensure the feature works as expected in all scenarios.

@hbmartin hbmartin merged commit 01fe42e into main Mar 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@hbmartin hbmartin deleted the hm/check-for-mangled-urls branch March 20, 2024 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants