Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to BOPTEST-Service as only deployment architecture #617

Open
9 of 11 tasks
dhblum opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
9 of 11 tasks

Migrate to BOPTEST-Service as only deployment architecture #617

dhblum opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@dhblum
Copy link
Collaborator

dhblum commented Feb 6, 2024

This issue will migrate BOPTEST-Service to be used as the only deployment architecture and RESTful API. The primary advantage and reason for this is to alleviate the need to maintain the two closely matched but not exact RESTful APIs, alleviate developers and users having to develop and maintain interfaces for each of them, and generally streamline the implementation of new BOPTEST features which are also supported by BOPTEST-Service. A downside is that the service architecture is more complex for those who use BOPTEST locally. However, with continued usage of docker-compose, users will still be able to deploy BOPTEST easily and in the same basic way.

Todos:

  • Migrate BOPTEST-Service code (Service v0.4.0, BOPTEST v0.6.0)
  • Fix 400 error response message in Service when wrong point name - see For the service implementation, invalid input names to advance do not return 400 as expected. #671.
  • Fix Julia example controller variable error, silence docker build
  • Pass all BOPTEST unit tests
  • Remove javascript example
  • Migrate Service-specific unit tests
  • Update release notes
  • Update README, including README example commands and unit test (if still needed)
  • Incorporate lessons-learned from ADRENALIN (logging and timeouts)
  • Update UserGuide
  • Update Website
@dhblum dhblum self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
@dhblum
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dhblum commented Feb 6, 2024

@kbenne FYI I've created this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant