-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turborepo #18
Comments
Is there any reason to add turborepo? I want to keep the project easy to start and easy to begin with. |
At this point in 2024 if you're a startup I'd recommend starting a project with Turborepo. It's likely that as a startup that you will need multiple applications and turborepo makes it easiest to have multiple applications. It's easier to start with turborepo rather than having to migrate a codebase into it later on. |
Indeed, if you need to have multiple application, Turborepo makes it easier. The project has only one application and currently, there is no plan to have multiple applications. I'll try my best to have one programming language, one framework, one application, etc. |
Turborepo can be a pain sometimes, don't bother |
Yes, I also think it'll add complexity in the project. Thank you for sharing your thought @jsonkcli |
I think now it would actually be a good time in case you wanted to implement such feature, as Turborepo 2.0 just got released. |
It's a good time to add the feature but currently not very convince about adding it, it would add more complexity into the project. And what will be the use case? In the current state or future state, what Turborepo will bring into the project? |
Can you add turborepo to this starter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: