-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature requests #56
Comments
Thank you, I agree on all points. I should say however that the coming weeks are quite busy and I don't know whether I'll have time for FOSS development.... |
Understood. Perhaps it will inspire you when the time comes to try the latest
Then you can do the third example in the
Here the runtimes are trivial. But in an example with ~10,000,000 observations, I found that using your package in this way halved run time. (I still need to document the new functionality and make the regression output more appropriate, e.g., by showing the log likelihood.) Right now the other two |
I'm adding support for this package to
reghdfejl
for Stata(!).This leads me to a few comments;
nlreg
accepted the GLMoffset
argument.dof_fes
field with the number of degrees of freedom consumed by the absorbed FE? FixedEffectModels has this.Also, I think it shouldn't crash when passed a formula with no
fe()
terms.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: