Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The <colModal> parameters can ignore so much the better #31

Open
zyz opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

The <colModal> parameters can ignore so much the better #31

zyz opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@zyz
Copy link

zyz commented Jun 24, 2016

Too many number of columns, This parameter must be very inconvenient.
for example: 30 to 50 columns

@meetselva
Copy link
Owner

Yes, it would be troublesome to configure each and every column.. Where do you set the column width? Letting the browser auto-set the width can be a problem.

@jxramos
Copy link

jxramos commented May 12, 2017

I think it's becoming clearer to me that this solution really does lean on the choice of colModal values. I'm providing it with a best guess passed down into jinja template generation but that's a funky hack. It would be great to generalize this solution somehow to autofit the body and header columns to be the same width much like how the body rows are used to update the fixed column's row heights.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants