Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

are SRV records correctly implemented? #552

Open
f1-outsourcing opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

are SRV records correctly implemented? #552

f1-outsourcing opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@f1-outsourcing
Copy link

I have the impression that SRV records are not correctly implemented should ._tcp not be at the front (after the service) instead of in the middle? Or do I have something incorrect in my mesos configuration that makes these groups act as part of the task name?

[@]$ dig +short _sip._udp.sip.voice.google.com SRV
20 1 5060 sip-anycast-2.voice.google.com.
10 1 5060 sip-anycast-1.voice.google.com.

[@~]$ dig +short @192.168.10.14 server.temp.test.marathon.mesos
192.168.10.151

[@~]$ dig +short @192.168.10.14 _server.temp.test._tcp.marathon.mesos SRV
0 1 31682 server.temp.test-grxx9-s0.marathon.mesos.

(no output)
bash-5.0# dig +short @192.168.10.14 _tcp.server.temp.test.marathon.mesos
bash-5.0# dig +short @192.168.10.14 server._tcp.temp.test.marathon.mesos
bash-5.0# dig +short @192.168.10.14 _server._tcp.temp.test.marathon.mesos

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant