Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider reworking behavior regarding missing id/source/target #97

Open
jjnesbitt opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Consider reworking behavior regarding missing id/source/target #97

jjnesbitt opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@jjnesbitt
Copy link
Member

Following #95, it occurs to me that there's another way to approach this problem.

Instead of simply ignoring nodes/links with those missing properties, we could include them anyway into the rows to insert into arango. Then, optional validation by the user would later reveal the missing keys. This may be a more versatile approach, as the user could then see any errors, as opposed to not finding the nodes/links.

@jjnesbitt jjnesbitt added the question Further information is requested label Feb 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant