Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Costs for ABN are out of date #39

Closed
miguelci opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Costs for ABN are out of date #39

miguelci opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@miguelci
Copy link

For already some time, the costs are different:
image

https://www.abnamro.nl/en/personal/investments/types-of-investing/self-directed-investing-basic/index.html

see: More information and conditions -> costs

@ArdaXi
Copy link

ArdaXi commented Dec 10, 2023

ABN Amro lists their service costs as annual, but charges them each quarter. So the calculation also takes them into account quarterly. The information is correct.

@miguelci
Copy link
Author

but aren't these the numbers being used in the application? they seem wrong from what i posted above no?

{
        "name": "ABN Amro",
        "logo": "abn.png",
        "product": "Zelf Beleggen Basis",
        "serviceFee": {
            "tiers": [
                {"upperLimit": 100000, "percentage": 0.05},
                {"upperLimit": 400000, "percentage": 0.03},
                {"upperLimit": null, "percentage": 0.015}
            ]
        },

@ArdaXi
Copy link

ArdaXi commented Dec 12, 2023

You missed the very next line.

"serviceFeeCalculation": "endOfQuarter",

EDIT: Slightly less glib, looking at the code it assumes everywhere that costs are quarterly, unless monthly is specified. This is after all how most brokers operate. So really, the cost overview from the bank is misleading. The same way they tend to be with interest rates.

If you were to take it into account the way they advertise, you would ignore the compounding effect of the multiple charges in a year.

@miguelci
Copy link
Author

oh okok, got it. was focusing on the actual percentage number and didn't reach that part.
thanks!

@nicwortel
Copy link
Owner

No worries @miguelci, it's actually a common mistake and I have to figure out a way to make this more clear on the website to prevent the confusion. Either way, thank you for contributing to the accuracy of the website!

And @ArdaXi thank you for helping to sort it out, I have been busy with other things lately and must have missed this issue 😅

@nicwortel nicwortel pinned this issue Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants