Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C_6 perturbatively and form level diagram of hetero/homonuclear interactions #123

Open
aqfarouk opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 Discussed in #122 · 2 comments
Open

C_6 perturbatively and form level diagram of hetero/homonuclear interactions #123

aqfarouk opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 Discussed in #122 · 2 comments

Comments

@aqfarouk
Copy link

Discussed in #122

Originally posted by Thapanio October 17, 2022
Hello,

I tried to compared the results of interaction energy for different types of interacting species and I found something can be interesting. I was trying to compare the values of C_6 calculated perturbatively and the values of C_3 and C_6 from level digram.

If I am not doing the calculations wrong, are there any reasons for the inconsistency of the calculated figures for homonclear interactions with different principal quantum number of Rydberg states (3rd figure), or heteronuclear interactions (4th figure) of Alkali atoms?

1. Interaction between two rubidium atoms in Rydberg state 61s1/2;

ARC-RbRb

2. Interaction between two cesium atoms in Rydberg state 65s1/2;

ARC-CsCs

3. Interaction between two rubidium atoms in Rydberg state 67s1/2 and 69s1/2;

ARC-AsRbRb

4. Interaction between cesium atom in Rydberg state 61s1/2 and rubidium atoms in Rydberg state 65s1/2;

ARC-CsRb

-Python notebook including the code is attached in the ZIP file.
ARC-Check.pdf
ARC-Check.ipynb.zip

@nikolasibalic
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Thapanio ,

Thank you for the message. I will have time to look at this only later next week. But what I can say is that C6 pertubative calculation as it is does not include exchange term. I would think that you might be seeing effects of that. To check, I made earlier this notebook that explores this term. Maybe you will find it useful to make a progress before I get some time to check in detail this case.

diagonal_and_exchange_terms(1).zip

@aqfarouk
Copy link
Author

aqfarouk commented Oct 19, 2022

Hi @Thapanio ,

Thank you for the message. I will have time to look at this only later next week. But what I can say is that C6 pertubative calculation as it is does not include exchange term. I would think that you might be seeing effects of that. To check, I made earlier this notebook that explores this term. Maybe you will find it useful to make a progress before I get some time to check in detail this case.

diagonal_and_exchange_terms(1).zip

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants