Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal] Graded Discussions MVP #351

Open
cassiezamparini opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

[Proposal] Graded Discussions MVP #351

cassiezamparini opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
discovery Pre-work to determine if an idea is feasible

Comments

@cassiezamparini
Copy link

cassiezamparini commented Apr 16, 2024

Product Coordinator: @cassiezamparini

Abstract

Currently, course teams and students use the Open edX Discussion Micro Frontend (MFE) to share ideas, views, and ask questions. However, there is no process for course admins to assign grades to student discussion responses. It should be possible to grade participation in discussions and factor this grading into a learner’s score for a course.

Context & Background

Arizona State University would like a way to grade their discussions, but due to budget constraints they cannot fund the entire proposed MVP.

Scope & Approach

View the entire scope and approach in our proposal here.

Value & Impact

See Use Cases section in the product proposal.

Milestones and/or Epics

  • Course Admins cannot assign points to learner discussion responses. Enforcing a grade will encourage students to participate in discussions, swap ideas, and interact with their peers.

  • Course Admins cannot define the criteria of the discussion grade in the discussion settings. Defining the criteria of a discussion grade will encourage how often students participate, as well as the content of their participation.

Named Release

Unsure

Timeline

To be determined

Proposed By

OpenCraft

Additional Info

No response

Copy link

Thanks for your submission, @openedx/open-edx-project-managers will review shortly.

@jmakowski1123
Copy link

cc @ayub02

@jmakowski1123
Copy link

reviews from @marcotuts and @sarina

@cassiezamparini
Copy link
Author

cassiezamparini commented Jun 4, 2024

The following people have volunteered to review:

The review period ends on the 30th of June 2024 😄

@cassiezamparini cassiezamparini added the discovery Pre-work to determine if an idea is feasible label Jun 5, 2024
@cassiezamparini
Copy link
Author

@marcotuts
@sarina
@AltamashShaban
@asma-ahmedd
@maguilarUXUI

Please let me know if you have any questions 😄

@cassiezamparini
Copy link
Author

@marcotuts
@sarina
@AltamashShaban
@asma-ahmedd
@maguilarUXUI

Thank you for some of your reviews so far. Because the conference is around the corner, I'm extending the review period to the 21st of July 2024. This will give you all a bit more time 😄

@sarina
Copy link
Contributor

sarina commented Jul 1, 2024

@cassiezamparini I left some comments and will continue to engage as they're replied to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discovery Pre-work to determine if an idea is feasible
Projects
Status: [Prod Proposals] In Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants