Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: Support radix tree. #216

Closed
2 tasks done
IRONICBo opened this issue Dec 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Feature: Support radix tree. #216

IRONICBo opened this issue Dec 30, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
@IRONICBo
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Milestone
v0.3

Comments

@IRONICBo
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

  • I've searched for similar issues and couldn't find anything matching
  • I've discussed this feature request in the OpenIMSDK Slack and got positive feedback

Is this feature request related to a problem?

❎ No

Problem Description

Router matching function is not efficient.

Solution Description

Use radix tree to support low-ram router matching.

Benefits

Enhance system.

Potential Drawbacks

No response

Additional Information

No response
@IRONICBo IRONICBo added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Dec 30, 2023
@IRONICBo IRONICBo added this to the v0.3 milestone Dec 30, 2023
@IRONICBo IRONICBo self-assigned this Dec 30, 2023
@cubxxw
Copy link
Contributor

cubxxw commented Dec 30, 2023

hi @IRONICBo Have you considered the specific technical details of a radix tree implementation, or have a preliminary implementation plan?

@IRONICBo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cubxxw Maybe I need to make a draft.

@cubxxw
Copy link
Contributor

cubxxw commented Feb 21, 2024

@IRONICBo If you ever need assistance, please feel free to ask at any time.

@kubbot
Copy link
Member

kubbot commented Apr 21, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

@kubbot kubbot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 21, 2024
@kubbot
Copy link
Member

kubbot commented Apr 28, 2024

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 7 days with no activity.

@kubbot kubbot closed this as completed Apr 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@IRONICBo IRONICBo

Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@IRONICBo @cubxxw @kubbot