Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve query for absence phenotypes #24

Open
balhoff opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Improve query for absence phenotypes #24

balhoff opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@balhoff
Copy link
Member

balhoff commented Oct 4, 2018

Currently absence phenotypes are very difficult to navigate in faceted browsing—either they are impossible to find or they can't be queried along with other phenotypes for a structure.

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented Oct 4, 2018

Need to test adding phenotype_of relations to absence phenotypes—can this interact cleanly with reasoning?

@wdahdul
Copy link
Contributor

wdahdul commented May 2, 2019

Still need this to work for queries to the term 'absent'

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 17, 2019

Need to make 'absent' searches automatically perform 'lacks all parts of type' searches.

@hlapp
Copy link
Member

hlapp commented May 17, 2019

Is this needed for the Evolution 2019 workshop? If yes, @balhoff or @wdahdul can either of you add it to the respective project?

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 20, 2019

I requested some changes to PATO which will make this more feasible: pato-ontology/pato#243

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented Nov 21, 2019

The phenotype_of changes appear to be working well. What still remains to be done is to add axioms to the KB that lump "reciprocal" queries together (facilitated by pato-ontology/pato#243 which is now merged).

@balhoff balhoff moved this from To do to In progress in SCATE Nov 21, 2019
@wdahdul wdahdul removed this from In progress in SCATE Feb 28, 2020
@wdahdul wdahdul added this to Priority to do in SCATE KB prioritization Feb 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
SCATE KB prioritization
  
Priority to do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants