Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v0.11 #277

Closed
basnijholt opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Release v0.11 #277

basnijholt opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@basnijholt
Copy link
Member

basnijholt commented May 19, 2020

Since 0.10.0 we fixed the following issues:

  • #273 add minimum number of points parameter to AverageLearner
  • #225 Error on windows: daemonic processes are not allowed to have children Runner bug
  • #267 Make Runner work with unhashable points Runner enhancement
  • #249 ipyparallel fails in Python 3.8 bug
  • #258 Release v0.10
  • #250 live_info looks is badly formatted in Jupyterlab
  • #233 SKOptLearner doesn't work for multi variate domain
  • #184 Time-based stop Runner enhancement
  • #206 Does not work with lambda functions

and merged the following Pull requests:

  • #278 prevent ImportError due to scikit-optimize and sklearn incompatibility
  • #274 AverageLearner: implement min_npoints AverageLearner enhancement
  • #268 make the Runner work with unhashable points Runner enhancement
  • #264 make learners picklable
  • #270 minimally require ipyparallel 6.2.5
  • #261 fix docs build and pin pyviz_comms=0.7.2
  • #263 add support for loky
  • #245 Optimize circumsphere and triangulation.py

and closed

  • #266 Make SequenceLearner points hashable by passing the sequence to the function.
  • #169 add building of test documentation of RTD
  • #262 test what happens in CI when trying to force-push

I say we do a new release because

  • we change the default behavior and use a loky executor
  • changed the way a runner stores points
  • learners pickled before make learners picklable #264, won't be unpickled correctly
  • we are before v1 and can do whatever we want

Also, basnijholt/adaptive-scheduler#39 is blocked from being merged because it relies on some new features.

@akhmerov and @jbweston, are you OK with releasing v0.11?

@basnijholt
Copy link
Member Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants