Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review current gas formulation in SpineOpt to see if it is possible to get rid of the BigMs there #1001

Open
datejada opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Type: improvement Improve something that already exists Zone: formulation How the model is formulated

Comments

@datejada
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Current gas flow formulation uses BigM constants that lead to bad solutions if they are selected correctly.

Describe the solution you'd like
Review the current formulation and check alternative formulations to either use one without BigMs or determine the value BigM should get more efficiently.

Describe alternatives you've considered
One starting point is this paper:
https://optimization-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/4580.pdf

Additional context
double-check more recent works on this topic.

@datejada
Copy link
Contributor Author

@g-moralesespana, We might want to use some of the findings we got from Thomas' research. Any thoughts?

@datejada datejada added Zone: formulation How the model is formulated Type: improvement Improve something that already exists labels Apr 30, 2024
@nnhjy
Copy link
Collaborator

nnhjy commented May 18, 2024

This paper looks useful as well
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100990

I kinda know the author and may contact the guy for help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: improvement Improve something that already exists Zone: formulation How the model is formulated
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants