Reputation/Points

[super3]

No description provided.

[mikhail-bot]

What if each user had a limited amount of points to give away per day. Lets for example say 10 points per user.

Because of the scarcity it will be concentrated in the top comments and leave out the riff raff.

This might also scale for larger communities, its just for those you might need 200 points instead of 20 points for your post to be a river bank (googling new river terminology at this point).

[super3]

Yeah I like that. However I think you should only get points when you are online. They should be slowly generated until you hit a cap (say 10 points). We can add some sort of limiting factor to this to prevent Sybil attacks

…

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 9:26 AM M-Bot ***@***.*** wrote: What if each user had a limited amount of points to give away per day. Lets for example say 10 points per user. Because of the scarcity it will be concentrated in the top comments and leave out the riff raff. This might also scale for larger communities, its just for those you might need 200 points instead of 20 points for your post to be a river bank (googling new river terminology at this point). — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADuLyXuSU-Hx2rKerksA98McvPHncIcks5uvCgIgaJpZM4YdzDJ> .

[mikhail-bot]

I head proof of work is a good way to prevent sybil attacks ;)

[montyanderson]

Proof of work would be pretty easy to implement.
They could also mine coins for us!