We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm getting this error when trying to upgrade rails from 7.0.8 to 7.1.0.
7.0.8
7.1.0
➜ my_app git:(main) ✗ bundle update rails Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/........ Resolving dependencies... Could not find compatible versions Because activejob-uniqueness >= 0.1.3, < 0.2.3 depends on activejob >= 4.2, < 7 and activejob-uniqueness >= 0.2.3 depends on activejob >= 4.2, < 7.1, activejob-uniqueness >= 0.1.3 requires activejob >= 4.2, < 7.1. Because rails >= 7.1.1 depends on activejob = 7.1.1 and rails >= 7.1.0, < 7.1.1 depends on activejob = 7.1.0, rails >= 7.1.0 requires activejob = 7.1.0 OR = 7.1.1. Thus, activejob-uniqueness >= 0.1.3 is incompatible with rails >= 7.1.0. So, because Gemfile depends on rails ~> 7.1.0 and Gemfile depends on activejob-uniqueness ~> 0.2, version solving has failed. ➜ shopify_app git:(main) ✗
It seems like this gem restricts itself to activejob versions < 7.1 here
< 7.1
activejob-uniqueness/activejob-uniqueness.gemspec
Line 31 in 96e207a
Is there a reason for this or would a simple fix to remove this restriction be OK? I haven't ran the specs without it to be sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I opened #66 #65 to get this moving.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Resolved by #66
No branches or pull requests
I'm getting this error when trying to upgrade rails from
7.0.8
to7.1.0
.It seems like this gem restricts itself to activejob versions
< 7.1
hereactivejob-uniqueness/activejob-uniqueness.gemspec
Line 31 in 96e207a
Is there a reason for this or would a simple fix to remove this restriction be OK? I haven't ran the specs without it to be sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: