How to use AdbDaemonDirectSocketsDevice and TCPSocket class to create connection?

[wbwxshao]

Hi all!
I found the two classes here: https://tango-adb.github.io/docs/tango/daemon/tcp/create-connection/
I would like to use these two classes and create wireless adb connection to Android devices. I already have the IP address and port details. When trying to implement this feature, I was not able to directly import AdbDaemonDirectSocketsDevice and TCPSocket class so I figured we need to create the class manually as shown in the doc. But there are errors when copying & pasting the code I saw several errors. For example, the below code
const readable = new PushReadableStream((controller) => { this.#socket.on('data', async (data) => { this.#socket.pause(); await controller.enqueue(data); this.#socket.resume(); });
is not assignable when sending into this.#opened.resolve()

this.#opened.resolve({ remoteAddress, remotePort, localAddress: this.#socket.localAddress!, localPort: this.#socket.localPort!, readable, writable: new WritableStream({ write: async (chunk) => { return new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { if (!this.#socket.write(chunk)) { this.#socket.once('drain', resolve); } else { resolve(); } }); }, close: async () => { this.#socket.end(); }, }), }); });

Any help will be appreciated!

[yume-chan]

I updated and tested the example code in that page. It should work now.

[wbwxshao]

Thanks a lot! Now it doesn't have any error.
One more question, is the Node.js code intended for a backend server? I tried to integrate the code for TCPSocket in my Angular frontend but when building got this error:
node:net - Error: Module build failed: UnhandledSchemeError: Reading from "node:net" is not handled by plugins (Unhandled scheme).
Webpack supports "data:" and "file:" URIs by default.
You may need an additional plugin to handle "node:" URIs.

[yume-chan]

Of course you can't use Node.js built in modules in Web browsers, but they are also not limited to backend servers, they are also available in Electron.

[wbwxshao]

Thanks for your answer! Would you mind looking at our other discussion here: #609 (reply in thread)
Please let us know if you are interested or not, we will not bother you anymore. Thanks!