Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use strict call for batch #51

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

use strict call for batch #51

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

shunjizhan
Copy link
Collaborator

@shunjizhan shunjizhan commented Nov 28, 2023

Change

use strictcall for batch. fixes #48

Test

e2e tests still pass

@shunjizhan shunjizhan marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2023 06:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b0f02a8) 91.05% compared to head (5202fd8) 91.06%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
src/utils/utils.ts 94.11% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #51      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.05%   91.06%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        1453     1466      +13     
  Branches      127      129       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1323     1335      +12     
- Misses        130      131       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shunjizhan shunjizhan requested a review from xlc November 28, 2023 06:34
@shunjizhan shunjizhan merged commit 317161e into master Nov 28, 2023
3 checks passed
@shunjizhan shunjizhan deleted the use-stric-call branch November 28, 2023 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use strict_call instead of eth_call_v2
2 participants