Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE]: Implement TPIK controller #12

Closed
evan-palmer opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17
Closed

[FEATURE]: Implement TPIK controller #12

evan-palmer opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This is a high priority issue

Comments

@evan-palmer
Copy link
Collaborator

Feature Type

Adding new functionality to Angler

Problem Description

The UVMS requires a method of determining the desired joint velocities for the system given some desired end effector position. A well-tested technique is the task-priority inverse kinematic (TPIK) controller. It would be useful to integrate support for this type of control into the angler system

Feature Description

I propose adding a new angler_control package which implements the TPIK controller. It may be worth considering a method which enables configuring the tasks and their priority within a configuration file as well, if possible.

Alternative Solutions

In the future, this controller may be replaced with a motion planner. It would be worth considering whether this controller is better off being placed in the angler_planning package if this type of controller can be replaced with motion planner.

Additional Context

No response

@evan-palmer evan-palmer added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 9, 2023
@evan-palmer evan-palmer self-assigned this Jun 9, 2023
@evan-palmer evan-palmer added the high priority This is a high priority issue label Jul 17, 2023
@evan-palmer evan-palmer linked a pull request Aug 2, 2023 that will close this issue
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This is a high priority issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant