Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison of multiple groups in rMATS #398

Open
mamarkevi opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Comparison of multiple groups in rMATS #398

mamarkevi opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@mamarkevi
Copy link

mamarkevi commented Apr 23, 2024

Good day!
Could you please specify if there is any pipeline where rMATS could be used for comparison of several groups with one condition? I'm a new in AS analysis and have the issue to compare AS events within several brain regions. As i understood i could obtain PSI for these samples separately, but without p-value and dPSI. Can i somehow to use rMATS for fully results?

@EricKutschera
Copy link
Contributor

If you have multiple groups that you want to compare you can follow: https://github.com/Xinglab/rmats-turbo/tree/v4.3.0?tab=readme-ov-file#running-the-statistical-model-separately

By combining all of your samples together in --task post all the alignments are used to detect a single set of splicing events. Then you can specify any two groups of samples to run the statistical analysis

Here's a similar post: #96 (comment)

@mamarkevi
Copy link
Author

Thank you, very much for your explanation. Could you please also suggest how better to obtain region-specific events, including dPSI? I mean comparison 1 vs others, 2 vs others with considering same lists events.

@EricKutschera
Copy link
Contributor

After you run all the samples in a post step you'll have the read counts for all samples for the event list. After that you can choose any two subsets of samples to run --task stat which will output p-value and delta PSI. The README section linked above describes running pairwise comparisons (1 to 2, 1 to 3, 2 to 3), but you can run 1 vs others, 2 vs others, ...

@mamarkevi
Copy link
Author

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants