Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mitigation of nonce issue #2490

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Mitigation of nonce issue #2490

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

emailtovamos
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Cherry-picking of this solution from geth: ethereum/go-ethereum#29034

Rationale

tell us why we need these changes...

Example

add an example CLI or API response...

Changes

Notable changes:

  • add each change in a bullet point here
  • ...

karalabe and others added 15 commits February 27, 2024 13:53
…106)

* core, triedb/pathdb: calculate the size for batch pre-allocation

* triedb/pathdb: address comment
* triedb/pathdb: fix panic in recoverable

* triedb/pathdb: add todo

* triedb/pathdb: rename

* triedb/pathdb: rename
* cmd: parseDumpConfig should not return closed db

* fix lint
* cmd/utils, core/rawdb, triedb/pathdb: flip hash to path scheme

* graphql: run tests in hash mode as the chain maker needs it
* eth/catalyst: update simulated beacon for cancun

* validate blob hashes

* compute hashes from commitment

* fix beacon root and payload version

* check commitment conversion

* fix random attr

* flip dev to cancun
…(#29034)

* eth: make transaction propagation paths in the network deterministic

* eth: avoid potential division by 0

* eth: make tx propagation dependent on local node id too

* eth: fix review comments
…(#29034)

* eth: make transaction propagation paths in the network deterministic

* eth: avoid potential division by 0

* eth: make tx propagation dependent on local node id too

* eth: fix review comments
@emailtovamos emailtovamos requested a review from zzzckck May 23, 2024 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants