First pass at using Linkedom instead of microlink #4
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uses Linkedom and probe-image-size to get a similar set of same data without relying on a third party service.
Some quick tests show a big improvement in speed:
The 3 demo links:
microlink: 3.99 seconds
linkedom: 1.98 seconds
10 random links:
microlink: 20.36 seconds
linkedom: 5.80 seconds
Moving to this adds more chance of missing data, would be worth adding tests to cover each of the selectors.
Would also be worth investigating using the metascaper packages instead for getting the data.
Also includes the same changes that are in #3 (custom cache, updated readme)