Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add description-level vocab, add full IDs for lookups (#359) #399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

fsteeg
Copy link
Member

@fsteeg fsteeg commented Jun 6, 2024

Will resolve #359.

Applies to new transformations. Deployed to test, re-ran updates for 2024-06-05:

https://test.lobid.org/gnd/search?q=describedBy.dateModified:2024-06-05&format=json

@fsteeg fsteeg requested a review from acka47 June 6, 2024 10:54
Copy link
Contributor

@acka47 acka47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 Everything looks good.

@acka47 acka47 assigned fsteeg and unassigned acka47 Jun 6, 2024
@fsteeg fsteeg merged commit 8c1a936 into master Jun 6, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

describedBy.descriptionLevel.label seems unrelated?
2 participants